Monday, December 4, 2006

The UFC Rematch - By The Numbers

On December 30, 2006, the UFC presents Chuck Liddell vs. Tito Ortiz 2. It got me thinking about past rematches in the UFC. Are there any type of trends? Is there a better way to predict the outcome? The answers I found were interesting. I only used UFC rematches for research. Which means more then one fight between fighters must take place in the UFC for it to count. For the purposes of this study, I did not include the Couture/Belfort 2 fight due to the weird nature of the ending and the lack of proof it really showed with a legit outcome. All other rematches were recorded. Here are some interesting statistics:

OVERALL
  • 31 Total Rematches
  • 64.5% of the rematches ended like the previous fight.
  • 35.5% ended differently then the previous fight. One of those fights is the Shamrock/Gracie 2 fight which ended in a Draw.
Now, this is just simple math. However, I wanted to go a step further and see if the length of time between rematches affected the outcome of the fights. And it did.

REMATCH: LESS THAN ONE YEAR
  • 13 Total Rematches
  • Only 2 created different outcomes (15.4%). The two fights were Lindland/Vitali 2 and Shamrock/Severn 2. The first Lindland fight was considered a fluke by many fans anyways. And the Shamrock fight was the worst in UFC history.
REMATCH: GREATER THAN ONE YEAR
  • 18 Total Rematches
  • 9 Different Outcomes (50%)
This is a MAJOR difference. Basically, if the rematch occurs quickly after the first fight, there is almost no chance for a different outcome. Now let's apply these numbers to the Liddell/Ortiz rematch.... And the possible GSP/Hughes 3 fight:
  • This gives Tito Ortiz a 50% chance of beating Chuck Liddell. However, Chuck Liddell is 4-0 in rematches in his MMA career. This gives the statistical edge to Chuck.
  • This brings new light to a possible Georges St Pierre vs. Matt Hughes rematch in 2007. Does Matt Hughes really want a quick rematch with such small odds of winning?
No matter how you think the upcoming rematches will pan out..... One thing is for certain..... Immediate Rematches in the UFC are not as warrented as they might appear to be.

Here is the overall list of UFC rematches:
  • Ken Shamrock vs. Royce Gracie 2
  • Ken Shamrock vs. Kimo Leopaldo 2
  • Ken Shamrock vs. Dan Severn 2
  • Ken Shamrock vs. Tito Ortiz 2
  • Ken Shamrock vs. Tito Ortiz 3
  • Dan Severn vs. Oleg Taktarov 2
  • Oleg Taktarov vs. Dave Beneteau 2
  • Pedro Rizzo vs. Tra Telligman 2
  • Randy Couture vs. Pedro Rizzo 2
  • Randy Couture vs. Vitor Belfort 3
  • Fabiano Iha vs. LaVerne Clarke 2
  • Don Frye vs. Mark Hall 2
  • Don Frye vs. Gary Goodridge 2
  • Guy Mezger vs. Tito Ortiz 2
  • Chuck Liddell vs. Jeremy Horn 2
  • Chuck Liddell vs. Randy Couture 2
  • Chuck Liddell vs. Randy Couture 3
  • Chuck Liddell vs. Renato Sobral 2
  • Shonie Carter vs. Matt Serra 2
  • Matt Lindland vs. Phil Baroni 2
  • Matt Lindland vs. Falaniko Vitale 2
  • Evan Tanner vs. Phil Baroni 2
  • Matt Hughes vs. Carlos Newton 2
  • Matt Hughes vs. Frank Trigg 2
  • Matt Hughes vs. BJ Penn 2
  • Matt Hughes vs. Georges St Pierre 2
  • Andrei Arlovski vs. Tim Sylvia 2
  • Andrei Arlovski vs. Tim Sylvia 3
  • Forrest Griffin vs. Stephan Bonnar 2
  • Rich Franklin vs. Evan Tanner 2
  • Frank Mir vs. Wes Sims 2

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting. The data aren't predictive though.

Where'd you get your dataset?

Anonymous said...

uum, the dataset is the list of matches he had at the end of the article. This definately pushes the common sense theory that a fighter needs to go back, regroup, and improve before being able to beat an opponent they have lost to.

Anonymous said...

Great analysis!

This definitely makes me think Hughes (and Franklin) would be better off facing other competition before an immediate rematch.

Anonymous said...

The fighter who lost needs time to convince themselves that they can compete for one thing.

To be honest, although I havent really looked at the list of fights in detail, I wouldnt be surprised if the turnarounds weren't just as much to do with one fighter getting older and hence losing the edge, or conversely one fighter just being too young in the first fight - a la GSP v Hughes 1.

None of your figures mean anything as far as I'm concerned, when it comes to Tito vs Chuck and GSP vs Hughes.... Only thing I think matters is that Chuck and Hughes are getting older.

Anonymous said...

Here's a bit of trivia to add to your analysis: all of Nevada's top 5 MMA gates have been rematches. All were title bouts too.

http://boxing.nv.gov/MMAgates.htm

Of course the relevant factor is that Liddell was on four of those five cards, not that the fights happened to be rematches.

Anonymous said...

One minor correction -- Ortiz vs. Liddell II takes place on Dec. 30, not Dec. 31.

Anonymous said...

http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com
http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com
http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com

Anonymous said...

http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com
http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com
http://www.mmarankings.wordpress.com

Anonymous said...

Very creative,I like it.

Anonymous said...

Wow all I can say is that you are a great writer! Where can I contact you if I want to hire you?